bxe-0.9.4 Release: lost ns in inlineXHTML-expl

[Michael Rolli]

Hi Chregu

Just downloaded newest release. Works great even in BitfluxCMS. ;-))) I
solved most problems we discussed last week (getArticle-pipline
manipulation due to ns stuff ...). I certainly will make a note in you
wiki about this pipeline and xhtml thing. ;-)

Looking at the inlineXHTML-example, shouldn't those
ToggleTextClass-thingies be b, i, .. with
ns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" in order to work.:

I now have:
<button name="b" col="1" row="1" action="ToggleTextClass"
ns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<button name="i" col="0" row="1" action="ToggleTextClass"
ns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<button name="sub" col="4" row="1" action="ToggleTextClass"
ns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<button name="sup" col="5" row="1" action="ToggleTextClass"
ns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
and it works just perfect with it. Out of the box, it doesn't.

I'm not quite sure if I should use <strong> in favour of <b>. Not bound
to bold but people are expecting bold anyway. Same for italic.
For underline and strikethrough as their tags <u> and <strike> aren't
xhtml-strict I'll keep searching for a solution. Maybe I'll switch to
xhtml-transitional. ;-)

Cheers
Michael

[Christian Stocker]

Hi Michael

Post by Michael Rolli
Hi Chregu
Just downloaded newest release. Works great even in BitfluxCMS. ;-))) I
solved most problems we discussed last week (getArticle-pipline
manipulation due to ns stuff ...). I certainly will make a note in you
wiki about this pipeline and xhtml thing. ;-)

great. thanks.

Post by Michael Rolli
Looking at the inlineXHTML-example, shouldn't those
ToggleTextClass-thingies be b, i, .. with
<button name="b" col="1" row="1" action="ToggleTextClass"
ns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<button name="i" col="0" row="1" action="ToggleTextClass"
ns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<button name="sub" col="4" row="1" action="ToggleTextClass"
ns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<button name="sup" col="5" row="1" action="ToggleTextClass"
ns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
and it works just perfect with it. Out of the box, it doesn't.

yes, that's right.. i didn't adjust the config.xml from the inline
example, that was the issue.

Can you send me your adjusted config.xml? then i can include it in the
distribution.

Post by Michael Rolli
I'm not quite sure if I should use <strong> in favour of <b>. Not bound
to bold but people are expecting bold anyway. Same for italic.
For underline and strikethrough as their tags <u> and <strike> aren't
xhtml-strict I'll keep searching for a solution. Maybe I'll switch to
xhtml-transitional. ;-)

just use <b> and <i>. I don't have a problem with it ;)

chregu

Post by Michael Rolli
Cheers
Michael

[Bruno Vernay]

Post by Christian Stocker

Post by Michael Rolli
I'm not quite sure if I should use <strong> in favour of <b>. Not bound
to bold but people are expecting bold anyway. Same for italic.
For underline and strikethrough as their tags <u> and <strike> aren't
xhtml-strict I'll keep searching for a solution. Maybe I'll switch to
xhtml-transitional. ;-)

just use <b> and <i>. I don't have a problem with it ;)

CSS doesn't work ?? It is supposed to be the solution.

[Michael Rolli]

Hi Bruno

Post by Bruno Vernay

Post by Christian Stocker
just use <b> and <i>. I don't have a problem with it ;)

CSS doesn't work ?? It is supposed to be the solution.

Sure you can use CSS to apply a style to <strong>.
But if the button you click on looks like bold your users will be
confused when it's then otherwise styled.
That's why I'll simply use <b> and <i>.

Cheers
Michael